PR 00274: verschil tussen versies

Huidige versie van 15 okt 2024 om 16:06

Decision support for resilient authorities working on MLS strategies

The uncertainty of climate change is a major challenge for flood managers to make robust decisions about flood management options in the North Sea Region countries. In addition, the governance settings of each country adds to the complexity of joint decision making for climate change adaptation to increase flood resilience. A so-called decision support system, or DSS, can assist authorities to identify the best options to increase flood resilience in their region.

The DSS is an integrated framework harmonized with the National Adaptation Strategies of the FRAMES countries, to support authorities during their decision-making process concerning more diversified and balanced strategies for flood risk management in their region.

The DSS has been jointly developed by the FRAMES consortium as a learning evaluation of the pilot activities; the experiences from all pilots have been integrated in the framework and local and regional contexts, climate, socio-economic, and hydraulic drivers were considered. Via the learning evaluation in FRAMES relevant target groups for the DSS have been involved in the development: local/ regional/ national authorities from involved regions, infrastructure and (public) service providers, interest groups (NGOs) and higher education and research centres. Based on the interviews with pilot managers, transnational focus groups and monitoring of pilot outcomes, the DSS brings together the transnational learning and knowledge from 16 FRAMES pilots into the MLS approach. The lessons learnt were also translated into policy recommendations.

Figure 1: Decision Support System - click on the boxes to find out more.

In this DSS, we link the knowledge gained from the 16 pilot projects to the layers of the MLS approach. By clicking on the boxes in the figure above, the following information will be provided:

A description of the action
The application of this action in FRAMES
Inter-dependencies with other MLS actions
Lessons learnt in FRAMES
Relevant adaptive capacities
Tools applied in FRAMES

Based on the experience in FRAMES, the highlighted actions in the DSS framework provide:

Authorities responsible for flood resilience: an overview and relevant knowledge in exploring a variety of MLS actions for enhancing FRM strategies.
National/regional authorities: support for regional/local authorities in the adaptive planning of their area, taking into account climate change uncertainties and flood proof design and planning of spatial investments.
Local and regional authorities: the possibility to conduct area based studies and explore additional actions to fine tune FRM strategies in their area or catchment.
NGOs involved in natural flood management (NFM) and community resilience: the possibility to align their activities with mainstream FRM strategies
NGOs and interest groups: strategies and tools to empower local communities to have a voice in FRM.
Infrastructure and service providers: a position in the field of flood resilience.
Higher education and research centres: available knowledge and cases on diversification of FRM and flood resilience.

Note that these actions, links and insights are the outcome of the pilot projects of the specific regions selected for FRAMES. Using this DSS for other regions will provide more insight into the possibilities and linkages of the MLS approach, but the exact recipe for successfully implementing MLS measures in other regions requires additional information about the governance context, the current flood risk management strategies, current and future flood scenarios and socio-economic development.

For questions, remarks or other comments, feel free to contact the researchers of the HZ University of Applied Sciences by clicking here.

Referenties

FRAMES: Policy recommendations for an integrated approach to flood management, FRAMES, FRAMES, 31 maart 2020.

@@ Regel 1: / Regel 1: @@
-[[Bestand:Roadmap.jpg|gecentreerd|miniatuur]]
+{{#set:Imagename=6_Frames_DSS_final_kleur.jpeg}}
-The FRAMES Decision Support System, or DSS, can be used as a road map with the following '''10 questions''' to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.
-'''1 What is the flood risk (sea, river, rainfall) and which are the flood risk challenges in your region?'''
+==== Decision support for resilient authorities working on MLS strategies ====
+The uncertainty of climate change is a major challenge for flood managers to make robust decisions about flood management options in the North Sea Region countries. In addition, the governance settings of each country adds to the complexity of  joint decision making for climate change adaptation to increase flood resilience. A so-called decision support system, or DSS, can assist authorities to identify the best options to increase flood resilience in their region.
-''Typical challenges for areas:''
+The DSS is an integrated framework harmonized with the National Adaptation Strategies of the FRAMES countries, to support authorities during their decision-making process concerning more diversified and balanced strategies for flood risk management in their region.
-* Coastal flooding as main challenge (Zeeland, Denmark)
-* Fluvial flooding and coastal flooding/influence  (Alblasserwaard, Wesermarsch)
-* Fluvial flooding (UK pilots, Belgium pilots)
-* Pluvial flooding: surface water flooding
-''When this is not clear, please make use of the following tools''
-* Flood risk maps delivered for the EU Flood Directive
-* Pilots: Scenario’s and other forecasting techniques to define future challenges
-* Pilots: IPCC reports and national adaptation strategies
-''Discuss flood risk scenarios and define challenges for resilient areas and communities with relevant stakeholders''
-'''2 What is the emphasis of the current FRMS applied in your area?'''
+The DSS has been jointly developed by the FRAMES consortium as a learning evaluation of the pilot activities; the experiences from all pilots have been integrated in the framework and local and regional contexts, climate, socio-economic, and hydraulic drivers were considered.  Via the learning evaluation in FRAMES relevant target groups for the DSS have been involved in the development: local/ regional/ national authorities from involved regions, infrastructure and (public) service providers, interest groups (NGOs) and higher education and research centres. Based on the interviews with pilot managers, transnational focus groups and monitoring of pilot outcomes, the DSS brings together the transnational learning and knowledge from 16 FRAMES pilots into the MLS approach. The lessons learnt were also translated into {{Cite|resource=Bestand:200407-frames policy recommendations a4 v4.pdf|name=policy recommendations|dialog=process-file-dialog}}. <imagemap>
-* Apply multilevel and multi-actor to discuss regional flood risk management strategies
+File:20200702 Frames DSS final kleur.jpg|center|900px|20200702 Frames DSS final kleur
-* Multilevel: EU, national, regional, local
+rect 756 984 1045 1128 [[LC 00262]]
-* Multi-actor: government, private companies, NGOs, citizens.
+rect 1575 571 2244 879 [[LC 00275]]
-'''3 How is flood risk management organized in my country?'''
+rect 62 573 696 877 [[LC 00239]]
+rect 756 426 1035 573 [[LC 00332]]
+rect 1143 653 1430 798 [[LC 00329]]
+rect 1144 361 1429 499 [[LC 00291]]
+rect 1820 1220 2000 1319 [[LC 00363]]
+rect 290 1220 470 1319 [[LC 00363]]
+rect 290 161 470 260 [[LC 00363]]
+rect 1820 161 2000 260 [[LC 00363]]
+rect 828 62 1460 359 [[LC 00292]]
+rect 820 1129 1469 1410 [[LC 00289]]
+rect 1143 876 1428 1005 [[LC 00330]]
+rect 1577 882 1859 1000 [[LC 00303]]
+</imagemap>''Figure 1: Decision Support System - click on the boxes to find out more.''
-''Table 1: Comparison of flood risk governance arrangements (FRGAs), adapted from {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Comparison-of-countries.pdf|name=Matzcak et al., 2016:72|dialog=process-file-dialog}}, completed for Germany and Denmark by using {{Cite|resource=Bestand:Buijs et al 2018.pdf|name=Buijs et al., 2018|dialog=process-file-dialog}}.''
-{| class="wikitable"
-!Characteristics of governance
-!Belgium
-!Germany
-!Denmark
-!the Netherlands
-!United Kingdom
-|-
-|Diversification & dominance
-|Moderately diversified, defence  still important
-|High diversified, focus on  defence
-|Highly diversified, focus on  defence
-|Low diversification, defence  dominant
-|Highly diversified, quite  balanced
-|-
-|Multi-sector
-|Water sector and spatial planning  gaining equal importance; water sector still important
-|Multi-sector involvement &  integrated by spatial planning
-|Multi-sector involvement (landowners  and farmers have a say; landowners do not pay)
-|Water sector dominant
-|Multi-sector involvement &  integrated by spatial planning
-|-
-|Multi-actor
-|Public (state dominant)
-|Public (state and federal states)  dominant
-|Public & private
-|Public (state dominant)
-|Public & private
-|-
-|Multi-level
-|Decentralised, tendency towards  centralisation
-|Central guidance & decentralization  to federal state & local level
-|Central guidance & ongoing  decentralization to local level
-|Both central and regional level
-|Central and local level
-|}
-'''4 What is the desired situation in relation to the flood risk challenges for the region?'''
+====== In this DSS, we link the knowledge gained from the 16 pilot projects to the layers of the MLS approach. By '''clicking on the boxes in the figure above''', the following information will be provided: ======
+* A description of the action
+* The application of this action in FRAMES
+* Inter-dependencies with other MLS actions
+* Lessons learnt in FRAMES
+* Relevant adaptive capacities
+* Tools applied in FRAMES
+Based on the experience in FRAMES, the highlighted actions in the DSS framework provide:
+* Authorities responsible for flood resilience: an overview and relevant knowledge in exploring a variety of MLS actions for enhancing FRM strategies.
+* National/regional authorities: support for regional/local authorities in the adaptive planning of their area, taking into account climate change uncertainties and flood proof design and planning of spatial investments.
+* Local and regional authorities: the possibility to conduct area based studies and explore additional actions to fine tune FRM strategies in their area or catchment.
+* NGOs involved in natural flood management (NFM) and community resilience: the possibility to align their activities with mainstream FRM strategies
+* NGOs and interest groups: strategies and tools to empower local communities to have a voice in FRM.
+* Infrastructure and service providers: a position in the field of flood resilience.
+* Higher education and research centres: available knowledge and cases on diversification of FRM and flood resilience.
+Note that these actions, links and insights are the outcome of the pilot projects of the specific regions selected for FRAMES. Using this DSS for other regions will provide more insight into the possibilities and linkages of the MLS approach, but the exact recipe for successfully implementing MLS measures in other regions requires additional information about the governance context, the current flood risk management strategies, current and future flood scenarios and socio-economic development.
-'''5 What are potential MLS-actions to enhance the flood resilience of your region?'''
+''For questions, remarks or other comments, feel free to contact the researchers of the HZ University of Applied Sciences by clicking {{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00712|name=here|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}.''
-Overview of actions based on analysis pilot activities
-* Linked to MLS layers
-* Linked to area context to apply actions: coastal, fluvial, pluvial
-* Linked to Diversification of Governance context to apply actions (or adaptation of FGRA required): low, medium, high
-* Pilots can be used as examples
-'''6 What is the impact of potential (spatial) actions on systems and sectors in the region?'''
-''Make sure to harmonize impact assessments with the national adaptation strategies''
-'''7 Who should be involved and what level should participation be?'''
-* Stakeholder analysis examples by project
-* Link to FRGA to support stakeholder analysis
-* Analysis of multilevel and multi-actor setting, including participation level, during pilot implementation
-* Analyse differences between pilot implementation and FRGA
-'''8 How can the implementation process for MLS-pilots be organized?'''
-There are three types of pilot implementation processes:
-* Goal oriented (Reimerswaal, …)
-* Participatory process oriented (UK)
-* Planning process oriented (DAPP Denmark)
-''Differences are mainly based on the governance context, the organization in the lead in the pilot and the  role in the FRGA.''
-'''9 What are potential barriers and success factors in the implementation of MLS actions and how can these be dealt with considering up-scaling of pilot results?'''
-'''10 Which capacities are key to foster adaptation towards a more diversified flood risk management strategy?'''
-* Analysis of adaptive capacities lacking, employed or emerging in pilots studies, based on pilot processes
-* Provides on a more abstract level to decision-makers which capacities are needed for planning, implementation and up-scaling of MLS
-* Roadmap for capacity building for pilots to become successful working on diversified FRM
-''Make sure to interview decision-makers about adaptive capacities''
 {{Project config}}
 {{Project
+|Name=Decision Support System
 |Supercontext=PR 00069
-|Project type=Standaard
 |Topcontext=PR 00069
-|Name=Decision Support System
 |Start date=2016/10/01
 |End date=2020/04/30
-|Summary=A road map with 10 questions to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.
+|Summary=A road map to help involved authorities identify how governance relates to the resilience of flood prone areas.
 |Show summary=Nee
-|Show navigation tree=Nee
+|Show extra=Nee
+|Show navigation tree=Ja
 |Show new page button=Nee
 |Show sub projects=Nee
@@ Regel 109: / Regel 60: @@
 |Show sources=Nee
 |Is homepage=Nee
-|Show edit button=Ja
+|Show edit button=Nee
 |Show VE button=Ja
 |Show sidebar=Nee
 |Show category label=Nee
 |Show title=Ja
+|Project type=Standaard
 }}

PR 00274: verschil tussen versies

Huidige versie van 15 okt 2024 om 16:06

Decision support for resilient authorities working on MLS strategies

In this DSS, we link the knowledge gained from the 16 pilot projects to the layers of the MLS approach. By clicking on the boxes in the figure above, the following information will be provided:

Referenties

Onderwerpen

Blijf op de hoogte!