LC 00414: verschil tussen versies
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
||
| Regel 1: | Regel 1: | ||
=== | === Specific outcomes === | ||
* The goal of the pilot has been reached: knowledge about vulnerability of vital infrastructure toward floods was acquired and the awareness of stakeholders was increased | * The goal of the pilot has been reached: knowledge about vulnerability of vital infrastructure toward floods was acquired and the awareness of stakeholders was increased | ||
* The results and knowledge generated through this pilot will be included as policy advise in the Agenda of the National Government and communicated to other vital infrastructure owners in other regions of the country. | * The results and knowledge generated through this pilot will be included as policy advise in the Agenda of the National Government and communicated to other vital infrastructure owners in other regions of the country. | ||
* There was excellent cooperation among the stakeholders | * There was excellent cooperation among the stakeholders | ||
* The proposed specific spatial preventive measure as outcome of this pilot is to build an inner dyke to protect the highway and railway. | * The proposed specific spatial preventive measure as outcome of this pilot is to build an inner dyke to protect the highway and railway. | ||
=== Flood risk management strategies (FRMSs) === | |||
Generally, flood risk governance (FRG) in the Netherlands is dominated by defence/flood protection through hard infrastructure. FRM belongs mainly to the public water sector (state) taking action at the central and regional level (Buijs et al. 2018). The next table shows the FRM strategies that were considered before, during and after FRAMES. | |||
{{Light Context | {{Light Context | ||
Versie van 5 jun 2019 14:22
Specific outcomes
- The goal of the pilot has been reached: knowledge about vulnerability of vital infrastructure toward floods was acquired and the awareness of stakeholders was increased
- The results and knowledge generated through this pilot will be included as policy advise in the Agenda of the National Government and communicated to other vital infrastructure owners in other regions of the country.
- There was excellent cooperation among the stakeholders
- The proposed specific spatial preventive measure as outcome of this pilot is to build an inner dyke to protect the highway and railway.
Flood risk management strategies (FRMSs)
Generally, flood risk governance (FRG) in the Netherlands is dominated by defence/flood protection through hard infrastructure. FRM belongs mainly to the public water sector (state) taking action at the central and regional level (Buijs et al. 2018). The next table shows the FRM strategies that were considered before, during and after FRAMES.
Referenties
- Baseline MONITORING SURVEY FRAMES – Baseline measurement – Pilot: Zeeland - Reimerswaal, Akkermans, R. and I. de Kubber, Province of Zeeland, 9 januari 2019.
- Adaptive planning for flood resilient areas: dealing with complexity in decision-making about multilayered flood risk management, Buijs, Jean-Marie; Luuk Boelens, Helge Bormann, Britta Restemeyer, Teun Terpstra, Tom van der Voorn, 24 april 2018.
- FRAMES pilotbook 2019, FRAMES, FRAMES, 1 mei 2019.
- Water Resilient Electricity Network Zeeland Final report, Nelen en Schuurmans, Provincie Zeeland, 25 juli 2018.
- FRAMES final report Reimerswaal, Witteveen Bos, 14 april 2019.