LC 00275: verschil tussen versies

Versie van 6 nov 2019 12:41

In FRAMES, we answered this question by taking into consideration the following:

Scenarios: look into different types of flood risk scenarios and consider what this would mean for your area
Area visions (in the Denderleeuw pilot, for instance, spatial planning for the valley was considered)
Adaptive planning (see the DAPP approach as applied in the Danish pilots)
Relevant time horizons

@@ Regel 1: / Regel 1: @@
-Used in the FRAMES pilots:
+In FRAMES, we answered this question by taking into consideration the following:
+* Scenarios: look into different types of flood risk scenarios and consider what this would mean for your area
--       Scenario’s: look into different types of flood risk scenario’s and consider what this would mean for the area (Reimerswaal: include toetspeil +1D en +2D; UK: climate scenarios)
+* Area visions (in the {{Internal link|link=LC 00271|name=Denderleeuw pilot|dialog=process-linkpage-dialog}}, for instance, spatial planning for the valley was considered)
+* Adaptive planning (see the DAPP approach as applied in the {{Internal link|link=FR Country 00004|name=Danish pilots|dialog=process-linkpage-dialog}})
--       Area visions (Dender: spatial planning for the valley)
+* Relevant time horizons
--       Adaptive planning (Denmark: DAPP approach)
-Relevant time horizons (workshop partner meeting UK).
-Check pilot input from workshop UK / paper provides insight in techniques that can be used (DAPP / Backcasting); also follow-up workshops with STAR2cs.
-Interview some decision-makers to get their input on this (names proposed in interviews).
 {{Light Context