LC 00579: verschil tussen versies
(Tekst vervangen door " {{Light Context |Supercontext=LC_00484 |Topcontext=PR 00276 |Toppage=Other |Sequence number=300000 |Sequence numbers=; |Context type=Situation |Heading=Wederzijds begrip v...") |
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
||
Regel 1: | Regel 1: | ||
'''Why explicating worldviews (this applies to stakeholders, but to Facilitators of Change as well)''' | |||
*''There can be'' unclarity, tension, conflict, misunderstanding, (mis)interpretation, exclusion, insecurity, forcing, criticizing, blaming | |||
*''What to explicate / identify:'' Worldviews, boundary judgements, blind spots: assumptions, beliefs, needs, expectations, values, interests, interpretations, observations, motives, (opposing) perspectives, allergies, intentions | |||
*''Solutions / approaches:'' Systems thinking, '''joint learning''', '''explication''', connection, co-creation, nature: participation (‘for you and with/by you’), postponing judgements, forming a coalition of the willing, community of learners, '''Dialoog en verbinden ('''Door middel van '''dialoog''' en wederzijds begrip over perspectieven van stakeholders (grensoordelen, d.w.z. aannames, overtuigingen, voorwaarden).''')''' | |||
*''What is helpful:'' an ambiance of safety, trust. Attitude: constructive, curiosity, openness, courage, respect, transparency, leadership, flexibility, enduring discomfort, allowing “no” as an answer. Continuously reflect “What to us (stakeholders) are the right and meaningful things to do?” | |||
*''Results:'' Overview of different worldviews and what is at stake, mutual understanding, trust, room for movement. '''Being heard''', recognition, eye-openers, clarity, connectedness >> An ongoing joint process | |||
{{Light Context | {{Light Context | ||
|Supercontext=LC_00484 | |Supercontext=LC_00484 |
Versie van 21 nov 2020 13:49
Why explicating worldviews (this applies to stakeholders, but to Facilitators of Change as well)
- There can be unclarity, tension, conflict, misunderstanding, (mis)interpretation, exclusion, insecurity, forcing, criticizing, blaming
- What to explicate / identify: Worldviews, boundary judgements, blind spots: assumptions, beliefs, needs, expectations, values, interests, interpretations, observations, motives, (opposing) perspectives, allergies, intentions
- Solutions / approaches: Systems thinking, joint learning, explication, connection, co-creation, nature: participation (‘for you and with/by you’), postponing judgements, forming a coalition of the willing, community of learners, Dialoog en verbinden (Door middel van dialoog en wederzijds begrip over perspectieven van stakeholders (grensoordelen, d.w.z. aannames, overtuigingen, voorwaarden).)
- What is helpful: an ambiance of safety, trust. Attitude: constructive, curiosity, openness, courage, respect, transparency, leadership, flexibility, enduring discomfort, allowing “no” as an answer. Continuously reflect “What to us (stakeholders) are the right and meaningful things to do?”
- Results: Overview of different worldviews and what is at stake, mutual understanding, trust, room for movement. Being heard, recognition, eye-openers, clarity, connectedness >> An ongoing joint process