LC 00565: verschil tussen versies

Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
k (Tekst vervangen - "reason of being" door "reason for existence")
 
(4 tussenliggende versies door 2 gebruikers niet weergegeven)
Regel 1: Regel 1:
EMM having EM<sub>ont</sub> as its core has been discussed in quite some detail. The key characteristics are recapitulated here to give a concise picture.
EMM having EM<sub>ont</sub> as its core has been discussed in quite some detail. The key characteristics are recapitulated here to give a concise picture.


Expertise Management Methodology (EMM):
* EMM is a methodology rooted in critical realism that acknowledges a real world on the one hand and self-constructed worldviews on the other hand;
* A Body of Knowledge and Skills (BOKS) can be constructed systematically through a process of abduction. This is an iterative process of induction and deduction to theorize from case studies;
* EMM supports a process of mutual understanding to recognize and acknowledge stakeholder’s worldviews by means of guided conversations and interpretations.
Expertise Management ontology (EM<sub>ont</sub>):
Expertise Management ontology (EM<sub>ont</sub>):
* The PQR formula is placed in context and applied recursively:
* The PQR formula is placed in context and applied recursively:
** P-R: the what and the why, i.e., the reason of being, or what we are;
** P-R: the what and the why, i.e., the reason for existence, or what we are;
** Q: the how, a particular way of doing things, i.e., what we do;
** Q: the how, a particular way of doing things, i.e., what we do;
** The PQR formula reads as a sentence, for instance: being there (P) by supporting our relatives, friends and neighbors (Q) in order to have an acceptable quality of life (R);
** The PQR formula reads as a sentence, for instance: being there (P) by supporting our relatives, friends and neighbors (Q) in order to have an acceptable quality of life (R);
* The ontological category Context unifies situation and roles in a situation. They are the same when viewed from a different perspective. A hierarchy of contexts can be created in which situations and roles can be part of many situations and roles to match real life situations;
* The ontological category Context unifies situation and roles in a situation. They are the same when viewed from a different perspective. A hierarchy of contexts can be created in which situations and roles can be part of many situations and roles to match real life situations;
* Conditions represent the system’s state. They reflect how well roles in situations are facilitated. Activities in different roles are decoupled by conditions to model Luhmannian kind of communications. Conditions irritate a PQR cluster, but it is up to the cluster itself to select a particular Q;
* Conditions represent the system’s state. They reflect how well roles in situations are facilitated. Activities in different roles are decoupled by conditions to model Luhmannian kind of communications. Conditions irritate a PQR cluster, but it is up to the cluster itself to select a particular Q;
* A belief is a condition that cannot be changed within the system, for example, legislation or fixed ideas;
* A belief is a condition that cannot be changed within the system, for example, legislation or fixed ideas.<!--  Practices define good and bad practices. A practice can be seen as a selection mechanism to reduce complexity by decreasing degrees of freedom in PQR clusters. A practice can be used to focus the attention on future actions based on the current and past conditions of a system.
* Practices define good and bad practices. A practice can be seen as a selection mechanism to reduce complexity by decreasing degrees of freedom in PQR clusters. A practice can be used to focus the attention on future actions based on the current and past conditions of a system.
 
* A system in execution leaves a trace consisting of alternating actions and updated conditions. This allows past conditions to be used in a current computation;
A system in execution leaves a trace consisting of alternating actions and updated conditions. This allows past conditions to be used in a current computation;
* EM<sub>ont</sub> is a so-called foundational ontology. It provides a basis for defining more application specific ontologies, such as:
 
** Human cognition and behavior model supporting reflection, emotions and mental condition;
EMont is a so-called foundational ontology. It provides a basis for defining more application specific ontologies, such as:
** Identity model based on self-perception, presentation and attribution;
 
Expertise Management Methodology (EMM):
Human cognition and behavior model supporting reflection, emotions and mental condition;
* EMM is a methodology rooted in critical realism that acknowledges a real world on the one hand and self-constructed worldviews on the other hand;
 
* A Body of Knowledge and Skills (BOKS) can be constructed systematically through a process of abduction. This is an iterative process of induction and deduction to theorize from case studies;
Identity model based on self-perception, presentation and attribution. -->
* EMM supports a process of mutual understanding stakeholder’s worldviews by means of guided conversations and interpretations.
 
In conclusion, EMM/EM<sub>ont</sub> and the accompanying theoretical concepts make a powerful tool for assessing the possibilities of change. The role of EM<sub>ont</sub> in EMM is to guide conversations and interpretations to investigate room of change in problematic situations, and to translate the outcomes into EM<sub>ont</sub> models. By means of the EMM process of abduction, a BOKS of a particular domain can be developed systematically.
In conclusion, EMM/EM<sub>ont</sub> and the accompanying theoretical concepts make a powerful tool for assessing the possibilities of change. The role of EM<sub>ont</sub> in EMM is to guide conversations and interpretations to investigate room of change in problematic situations, and to translate the outcomes into EM<sub>ont</sub> models. By means of the EMM process of abduction, a BOKS of a particular domain can be developed systematically.


EMM is rooted in systems thinking (hard, soft and critical) and first-order and second-order cybernetics. For instance, the influence of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) can be recognized in the key role of the PQR formula. The second-order cybernetic principles of self-referential, self-production, autonomy and closure can be applied in EM<sub>ont</sub> to model operationally closed and structurally open systems in terms of PQR clusters in context.
EMM is rooted in systems thinking (hard, soft and critical) and first-order and second-order cybernetics. For instance, the influence of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) can be recognized in the key role of the PQR formula. The second-order cybernetic principles of self-referential, self-production, autonomy and closure can be applied in EM<sub>ont</sub> to model operationally closed and structurally open systems in terms of PQR clusters in context (see {{Internal link|link=LC 00512|name=Social Innovation Applications|dialog=process-linkpage-dialog}}).


EMM supports a process of mutual understanding, which may already paves the way to worldview accommodation. The {{Internal link|link=LC 00346|name=Social Theory|dialog=process-linkpage-dialog}} (ST) of a sustainable, collaborative learning society takes this to the level of shared meaning.
EMM supports a process of mutual understanding, which may already paves the way to accommodation of worldviews. The {{Internal link|link=LC 00346|name=Social Theory|dialog=process-linkpage-dialog}} (ST) of a sustainable, collaborative learning society takes this to the level of shared meaning by exploring cultural identity explicitly.


{{LC Book config}}
{{LC Book config}}
Regel 37: Regel 41:
|Show VE button=Ja
|Show VE button=Ja
|Show title=Ja
|Show title=Ja
|EMM access control=Access:We got to move,
}}
}}
{{LC Book additional
{{LC Book additional
|Preparatory reading=LC 00520,
|Preparatory reading=LC 00520
}}<accesscontrol>Access:We got to move</accesscontrol>
|Continue reading=LC 00512,
}}

Huidige versie van 29 apr 2023 om 11:45

EMM having EMont as its core has been discussed in quite some detail. The key characteristics are recapitulated here to give a concise picture.

Expertise Management Methodology (EMM):

  • EMM is a methodology rooted in critical realism that acknowledges a real world on the one hand and self-constructed worldviews on the other hand;
  • A Body of Knowledge and Skills (BOKS) can be constructed systematically through a process of abduction. This is an iterative process of induction and deduction to theorize from case studies;
  • EMM supports a process of mutual understanding to recognize and acknowledge stakeholder’s worldviews by means of guided conversations and interpretations.

Expertise Management ontology (EMont):

  • The PQR formula is placed in context and applied recursively:
    • P-R: the what and the why, i.e., the reason for existence, or what we are;
    • Q: the how, a particular way of doing things, i.e., what we do;
    • The PQR formula reads as a sentence, for instance: being there (P) by supporting our relatives, friends and neighbors (Q) in order to have an acceptable quality of life (R);
  • The ontological category Context unifies situation and roles in a situation. They are the same when viewed from a different perspective. A hierarchy of contexts can be created in which situations and roles can be part of many situations and roles to match real life situations;
  • Conditions represent the system’s state. They reflect how well roles in situations are facilitated. Activities in different roles are decoupled by conditions to model Luhmannian kind of communications. Conditions irritate a PQR cluster, but it is up to the cluster itself to select a particular Q;
  • A belief is a condition that cannot be changed within the system, for example, legislation or fixed ideas.

In conclusion, EMM/EMont and the accompanying theoretical concepts make a powerful tool for assessing the possibilities of change. The role of EMont in EMM is to guide conversations and interpretations to investigate room of change in problematic situations, and to translate the outcomes into EMont models. By means of the EMM process of abduction, a BOKS of a particular domain can be developed systematically.

EMM is rooted in systems thinking (hard, soft and critical) and first-order and second-order cybernetics. For instance, the influence of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) can be recognized in the key role of the PQR formula. The second-order cybernetic principles of self-referential, self-production, autonomy and closure can be applied in EMont to model operationally closed and structurally open systems in terms of PQR clusters in context (see Social Innovation Applications).

EMM supports a process of mutual understanding, which may already paves the way to accommodation of worldviews. The Social Theory (ST) of a sustainable, collaborative learning society takes this to the level of shared meaning by exploring cultural identity explicitly.
























Overgenomen van "https://kenniscentrumtoerisme.nl/wiki/index.php?title=LC_00565&oldid=95036"