LC 00278: verschil tussen versies

Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
Regel 6: Regel 6:
The primary stakeholders are citizens and companies located in flood-prone zones (as defined by the flood risk maps). In addition, the following stakeholders are identified:
The primary stakeholders are citizens and companies located in flood-prone zones (as defined by the flood risk maps). In addition, the following stakeholders are identified:


'''Public actors''':
''Public actors:''
* {{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00428|name=Municipality of Denderleeuw|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}
* {{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00428|name=Municipality of Denderleeuw|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}
* Flemish spatial planning department ({{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00429|name=Department Omgeving|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}})
* Flemish spatial planning department ({{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00429|name=Department Omgeving|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}})
Regel 16: Regel 16:
* Public secondary school of Denderleeuw
* Public secondary school of Denderleeuw
* {{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00434|name=Natuurpunt|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}
* {{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00434|name=Natuurpunt|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}
'''Citizens''':
''Citizens:''
* The students of the secondary school
* The students of the secondary school
'''Private actors''':
''Private actors:''
* {{Cite|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00435|name=Verbond West-Brabantse Ondernemingen|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}
* {{Cite|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00435|name=Verbond West-Brabantse Ondernemingen|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}
* {{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00436|name=Bedrijvencentrum Aalst|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}
* {{External link|resource=Resource Hyperlink 00436|name=Bedrijvencentrum Aalst|dialog=process-linkwebsite-dialog}}
==== Role of key actors ====


===== '''Public actors''' =====
* The main accomplishment was to engage the public actors of Ninove into a participation process. This engagement was rather problematic and difficult. Time was needed to evolve the actors’ perception and passive stance into a more interestingly willing approach. A real collaboration is now set (February 2019) with the new alderman of spatial planning and environment have officially stated his interest in collaborating in the project, the departments of mobility and public works as well as the sewer manager and the social housing company showing positive participations. The collaboration will lead at least the development of a Vision Plan for the whole flooding area of the centre of Ninove and at best to an action Plan with specific measures.
* An interesting achievement is the participation of the Flemish Waterways. This public actor, responsible of the navigable river management, was not well acquainted with participative procedures, presenting in the past a high reluctance and scepticism to follow this kind of process. The Flemish Waterways were involved in the participation process of Ninove.
* The collaboration with Geraardsbergen started later, in September 2018. Geraardsbergen was originally not part of the project pilot but showed a very positive collaborative stance, probably due to the fact that the city already have taken participative measures with local inhabitants and that it’s more often subject to flooding.
* Schools in Denderleeuw were interested in working with the UGhent on the school program. Resulting from the interviews with the teachers, it was clear that the primary teachers considered climate change as being an important societal issue. They also argued that climate change was already present in the teacher’s curriculum but only about subjects related to climate change mitigation (CO2 reduction measures) and not climate change adaptation. They stated that they learned something about the future challenges but regardless of this honest confession, they argued a change in the primary teachers’ curriculum was not needed. Further workshops are planned in April and May. For now, the accomplishment of this part of the project is the raise of awareness but additional collaboration should be needed to activate pragmatic reaction.
=====  '''Citizens''' =====
* 5 community resilience workshops were delivered. The workshops in the fire brigade office and the café ’De Belleman’ were very effective with a high presence and active participation of the inhabitants. One workshop, in Okegem, did not result an active participation and had essentially
* Awareness-raising brochure ‘Water zonder overlast’, was produced and is continuously distributed (both for flood prone citizens and the wider community).
* The preparedness manual is in progress, it is made by flood-prone citizens for newcomers to the area, in cooperation with the fire brigade.
* The incorporation of flood risk / water issues into neighbourhood information networks could take place in the upcoming months. However, it is entirely dependent on the head of the police department’s willingness.
* The school program has let to the raise of awareness amongst children of the needs for climate change adaptation measures. Further information sessions with teachers’ and parents could be organised in June or in the first semester of the year 2019-2020.
{{Light Context
{{Light Context
|Supercontext=FR_PLT_PR_00011
|Supercontext=FR_PLT_PR_00011

Versie van 25 jun 2019 10:23

By looking at the the activities, actors and methods/approaches used, this section will provide a better understanding of the the implementation process of the MLS approach. We will look describe the point of departure, describe who was involved (when, why and how) and what key decisive moments there were.

Point of departure of FRM strategies

Web Denderleeuw.jpg

Figure 2. Initial and desired score to reach per layer in the Denderleeuw pilot (Baseline monitor, 2017)

Stakeholders involved

The primary stakeholders are citizens and companies located in flood-prone zones (as defined by the flood risk maps). In addition, the following stakeholders are identified:

Public actors:

Citizens:

  • The students of the secondary school

Private actors:

Role of key actors

Public actors
  • The main accomplishment was to engage the public actors of Ninove into a participation process. This engagement was rather problematic and difficult. Time was needed to evolve the actors’ perception and passive stance into a more interestingly willing approach. A real collaboration is now set (February 2019) with the new alderman of spatial planning and environment have officially stated his interest in collaborating in the project, the departments of mobility and public works as well as the sewer manager and the social housing company showing positive participations. The collaboration will lead at least the development of a Vision Plan for the whole flooding area of the centre of Ninove and at best to an action Plan with specific measures.
  • An interesting achievement is the participation of the Flemish Waterways. This public actor, responsible of the navigable river management, was not well acquainted with participative procedures, presenting in the past a high reluctance and scepticism to follow this kind of process. The Flemish Waterways were involved in the participation process of Ninove.
  • The collaboration with Geraardsbergen started later, in September 2018. Geraardsbergen was originally not part of the project pilot but showed a very positive collaborative stance, probably due to the fact that the city already have taken participative measures with local inhabitants and that it’s more often subject to flooding.
  • Schools in Denderleeuw were interested in working with the UGhent on the school program. Resulting from the interviews with the teachers, it was clear that the primary teachers considered climate change as being an important societal issue. They also argued that climate change was already present in the teacher’s curriculum but only about subjects related to climate change mitigation (CO2 reduction measures) and not climate change adaptation. They stated that they learned something about the future challenges but regardless of this honest confession, they argued a change in the primary teachers’ curriculum was not needed. Further workshops are planned in April and May. For now, the accomplishment of this part of the project is the raise of awareness but additional collaboration should be needed to activate pragmatic reaction.
  Citizens
  • 5 community resilience workshops were delivered. The workshops in the fire brigade office and the café ’De Belleman’ were very effective with a high presence and active participation of the inhabitants. One workshop, in Okegem, did not result an active participation and had essentially
  • Awareness-raising brochure ‘Water zonder overlast’, was produced and is continuously distributed (both for flood prone citizens and the wider community).
  • The preparedness manual is in progress, it is made by flood-prone citizens for newcomers to the area, in cooperation with the fire brigade.
  • The incorporation of flood risk / water issues into neighbourhood information networks could take place in the upcoming months. However, it is entirely dependent on the head of the police department’s willingness.
  • The school program has let to the raise of awareness amongst children of the needs for climate change adaptation measures. Further information sessions with teachers’ and parents could be organised in June or in the first semester of the year 2019-2020.























Referenties