LC 00330: verschil tussen versies
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting |
||
Regel 1: | Regel 1: | ||
====== 9 What are potential barriers and success factors in the implementation of MLS actions and how can these be dealt with considering up-scaling of pilot results? ====== | |||
* Interviews will reveal lessons learnt | |||
* Analyse the internal/external success factors and barriers in the implementation of pilots and up-scaling; see table 5 below. | |||
''Table 5: conditions for successful pilots and conditions for uptake ([https://pure.tudelft.nl/portal/en/publications/the-pilot-paradox-exploring-tensions-between-internal-and-external-success-factors-in-dutch-climate-adaptation-projects(ffd77466-9d8c-4947-bc00-072c7b9397b1).html Van Buuren et al., 2018]).'' | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
!Element | |||
!Conditions for successful pilots | |||
!Conditions for uptake | |||
|- | |||
|''Position of the pilot'' | |||
|At a distance from home bases (freedom to explore novel ideas) | |||
|Stay connected: conscious strategy to create normative congruence | |||
|- | |||
|''Resource distribution'' | |||
|Additional resources for the pilot to enable creativity and exploration | |||
|Solutions fit within the existing system of resource-distribution and contribute to organizational aims of efficiency and risk reduction | |||
|- | |||
|''Participants'' | |||
|Coaling of (willing) boundary spanners | |||
|Representativeness of involved actors from all relevant disciplines and stakes of the future implementation arena | |||
|- | |||
|''Process design'' | |||
|Learning environment, tailor-made collaborative process design | |||
|Results ready for mainstreaming and broader embedding. Focus on where the results have to land. | |||
|- | |||
|''Project design'' | |||
|Limited scale to reduce risks and (financial) impacts, high quality (shared) monitoring and analysis | |||
|Sufficient system understanding; outcomes considered representative and of high quality | |||
|} | |||
{{Light Context | {{Light Context | ||
|Sequence number=200000 | |Sequence number=200000 |
Versie van 1 nov 2019 13:41
9 What are potential barriers and success factors in the implementation of MLS actions and how can these be dealt with considering up-scaling of pilot results?
- Interviews will reveal lessons learnt
- Analyse the internal/external success factors and barriers in the implementation of pilots and up-scaling; see table 5 below.
Table 5: conditions for successful pilots and conditions for uptake (Van Buuren et al., 2018).
Element | Conditions for successful pilots | Conditions for uptake |
---|---|---|
Position of the pilot | At a distance from home bases (freedom to explore novel ideas) | Stay connected: conscious strategy to create normative congruence |
Resource distribution | Additional resources for the pilot to enable creativity and exploration | Solutions fit within the existing system of resource-distribution and contribute to organizational aims of efficiency and risk reduction |
Participants | Coaling of (willing) boundary spanners | Representativeness of involved actors from all relevant disciplines and stakes of the future implementation arena |
Process design | Learning environment, tailor-made collaborative process design | Results ready for mainstreaming and broader embedding. Focus on where the results have to land. |
Project design | Limited scale to reduce risks and (financial) impacts, high quality (shared) monitoring and analysis | Sufficient system understanding; outcomes considered representative and of high quality |
Referenties
- https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-006-9089-3, Berkhout, Hertin and Gann,, 1 januari 2006.
- Guide to dynamic planning Assens Vejle, Danish Coastal Authority, Danish Coastal Authority, 30 mei 2020.
- Medway Flood Action Plan, Environment Agency, 1 november 2017.
- Hazard, Vulnerability, and Resilience, Etkin, D., 1 januari 2016.
- FRAMES excursion Wesermarsch, FRAMES, 1 januari 2019.
- Stakeholder analysis report FRAMES, FRAMES Consortium, 1 januari 2020.
- Adaptive capacities FRAMES definitions and examples, Gupta et al, 20 april 2020.
- The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society, Gupta et al., 1 januari 2010.
- Patel et al., 2017, Patel, 1 januari 2017.
Hier wordt aan gewerkt of naar verwezen door: Layer 3- Preparedness and response